360-DEGREE
EVALUATION FORM
RATER
ASSESSMENT
For use by:
Residents, Students, Attendings, Directors, and Health Care Team Members
INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS
The University of
Maryland School of Medicine, Primary Care
This process provides a full-circle
view of resident/student skills and abilities by gathering information from
various perspectives: the individual and others (peers, supervisors, patients,
health care team members). This profile
provides a more balanced overview than self-evaluation or peer/supervisor
review.
The completed questionnaires will be
compiled into a final report for the resident/student. Anonymity for those
completing the report helps ensure that ratings and comments are fair as well
as skill and behavior-based.
Please
rate the individual based on your recent experience with him/her. Be
realistic, honest, and direct. This is a
formative evaluation process (one
designed to provide feedback for improvement) not a summative one (designed for promotion or retention purposes).
|
Not
Applicable |
Rarely
demonstrates (<25% of the time) |
Sometimes
demonstrates (25-50% of the time) |
Demonstrates
in most cases (50-75% of the time) |
Demonstrates
in majority of cases (>75% of time) |
Example:
Benchmark:
“Uses effective listening skills to elicit information”
Comment: “Needs some improvement here.” This is too vague.
Better comment: When with patients seems distracted by other
things going on. If patients sense this,
they may feel unimportant.”
It is especially important to take the
time to enter narrative comments in the text boxes provided. The value of the
360-degree process is largely dependent on you and others being thoughtful,
candid and, where appropriate, constructively critical.
Adapted in part from RE Brown & Associates,